Friday, October 23, 2026
AI Bagholders
Saturday, October 17, 2026
Sneak Preview of 2027
Credit spreads for AI data center stocks are blowing out and investors are starting to question the sustainability of the AI capex boom. Last month, Anthropic delayed its IPO, which was initially planned for October into November/December. Firmus, an AI data center company, scrapped its $5B IPO plans this month, when there wasn't demand at a $30B valuation.
The hot topic of the weak, CRWV credit spreads, are blowing out.
The hyperscalers have gone into negative free cash flow at current spend levels. In order to have further growth from current capex, additional capital will need to come from equity/bond investors. It appears that even at these higher yields, there just isn't as much demand as most expected from bond investors. As for equity capital, if you push valuations to nosebleed levels, IPO buyers think twice about whether they can even flip for a profit. That's why you are seeing AI IPOs getting delayed. After seeing how the SPCX IPO played out, people are realizing the upside is limited when you IPO at ridiculous levels. There aren't enough speculators out there to chase these AI stocks at crazy valuations. Those gamblers have already gorged themselves on AI names, and have little room to add more bags to their portfolio.
Musk has front run the crowd brilliantly by taking up a huge chunk of equity capital before the other big AI players were ready to come to the money trough. Now, Anthropic and Open AI will probably have to IPO at lower valuations than they want to, in order to attract enough initial bids.
The parabolic phase of the AI bubble has ended. The NDX is now 4 months into the choppy, messy, and sometimes violent sideways range that form a long term top. For the SPX, it has been 2 months since the initial top just above SPX 7800. The length of the choppy, range bound phase varies for each bull market. The following are some bull market top charts for reference.
2000: Initial top in late March. Range bound phase (5 months) until final top in early September.
![]() |
| SPX 2000 Top |
2007: Initial top in mid July. Range bound phase (3 months) until final top in mid October.
![]() |
| SPX 2007 Top |
2015: Initial top in late November 2014. Range bound phase with only marginal higher highs until final top in late July (8 months)
![]() |
| SPX 2015 Top 2018: Initial top in late January. Range bound phase with margin higher highs until final top in early October (8 months) |
![]() |
| SPX 2018 Top |
![]() |
| SPX 2022 Top |
Saturday, October 10, 2026
Listless
Then you have the breadth boys. The same old technicians on Twitter complaining about bad breadth. Those guys still think that strong breadth is the cure all for the world's ills. Never mind that a broadening market with good breadth in January and February preceded the worst month of the year. Same thing happened in July 2024 as the market broadened out, right before you had the worst 2 weeks of the year. In the stock market, they never let facts get in the way of a good story.
Rather than resilience, the more apt word to describe the market is listless. It should feel more exciting than this. If AI is as transformational as all the pumpers out there are saying, why does this market seem so boring? Even a lot of the AI names feel waterlogged. NDX is still in a long term uptrend, but now its going up in drips and drabs, you aren't seeing the parabolic frolic that you saw for most of 2024, second half of 2025, and in Q2 of 2026. You get a couple of up days, everything looks great, and then you get an out of the blue gap down that takes back all the previous day's gains, just like you saw on Wednesday.
The market feels saturated. The chasers don't have to chase anymore to get their allocation of the hottest names. They can wait a few days and they get their pullback, and can buy cheaper. Why would anyone in this market want to chase strength when they can wait a few days and buy on weakness at lower prices? When uptrends flatten out and you get sideways chop, chasers get punished, and regret buying into strength. Those who are more patient are getting filled quicker, and don't feel the need to chase anymore, because pullbacks, while being shallow, are more frequent. It reinforces the lack of momentum in this market.
A lot of money has poured into US stocks over the past 3 years. In particular, the last 12 months. Expecting these kind of equity inflows to continue is wildly optimistic. We've had historic levels of money pouring in. It seems like everyone has a big allocation to US stocks, yet many say that its the most hated bull market ever. Its like Yogi Berra said: no one goes there anymore, its too crowded.
We are in that awkward period where stocks are still in an uptrend, but the trend is weakening, and the majority are heavily allocated to the best performing names, which are outperforming, so no one is really worried. They talk about bond yields and how they could hurt stocks, but I still hear a lot of those CNBC experts who think that the Fed could just hike one more time and be finished with this rate hiking "cycle". There is still plenty of denial out there. Many are still skeptical that the Fed will continue hiking rates beyond December into 2027. The STIRs market is pricing in 4 more hikes for the next 12 months. I'll pick the market prediction over a CNBC talking head any day.
All this talk about the bond market is a distraction from the real mover, AI. All it took was an FT rumor about OpenAI revenue estimates being $20B less than forecast to trigger a quick intraday downdraft. After the dust has settled, all the NDX outperformance over SPX since September 21 has been erased in a span of 2 days. That is meaningful. The NDX strength made me hesitant to short this market. Now that NDX is no longer outperforming, it makes me want to short the next bounce that comes.
BofA client stock, bond, and cash allocations, as of October 1.
SpaceX saw net flows 50% higher than the second-ranked stock, with buying peaking in the final week of the month. The size and timing of the flows suggest enthusiasm remained strong rather than fading as the month progressed.
Post opex Octobers (starting October 16) have been historically weak.
They continue to buy the dip in the long end.
Heavy inflows into government bonds last 2 weeks.
Rising global bond yields are a symptom of a lack of liquidity at current prices for stocks and bonds. When there is plenty of liquidity in the system, you get both stocks and bonds rising. When there is a liquidity constraint, it is difficult for both stocks and bonds to go up together. In the short to intermediate term, stock-bond correlation is mixed. In the long term, bond market weakness is often a leading indicator for stock market weakness.
The big event for the coming week is the CPI on October 14, and opex on October 16. I expect a grind higher into the CPI number, and then a pullback afterwards as we get to the 2nd half of month. Still on the sidelines waiting for a bit more of a rally to put on shorts, in both stocks and bonds. This time, the time frame for the short trade will be less than 2 weeks. It still feels too early to put on long term shorts, as we likely get a post election relief rally in November, even with a Democrat sweep of Congress.
Saturday, October 3, 2026
Bonds in the New Normal
I remember back in 2009 and 2010 when everyone was waiting for the Fed to get back to more normal, higher interest rates and it kept getting delayed and delayed with various excuses. It was excruciatingly slow how they tapered QE, how they stayed at ZIRP, how worried people were about rates getting too high in 2018 when Powell went from 2.25 to 2.50% on Fed funds. Looking back, investors were out of their minds, thinking 2.5% Fed funds would crush the economy.
You still hear the voices on CNBC, Twitter, who say that the Fed doesn't need to raise rates, even with sticky inflation. That is based on the distorted views coming from over a decade of ZIRP and low interest rates. Many people still view 4% Fed funds rates as being restrictive. Its not restrictive when the US government runs 6% deficits during an economic expansion and an AI investment boom. In a recession, those 6% deficits easily double to 12%+ deficits. Probably even higher as politicians pump out monster stimmy and pork packages during a downturn.
Fiscal dominance makes high interest rates less effective in slowing down the economy, due to the sheer size of the national debt, and the amount the Treasury funds the deficit using T-bills. Higher Fed funds rates quickly result in higher interest payments to T-bill buyers, which is a kind of fiscal stimulus on its own.
The current 6% deficits are papered over with Treasury issuance running at over $2 trillion per year. There is a supply/demand mismatch. Without the Fed doing QE, you are left with price sensitive buyers who only buy if the yields are high enough. Foreign buyers who have to recycle US dollars from their trade surplus would rather buy gold (China) or US equities (Europe) than US Treasury paper. The government has clearly shown that it doesn't care about deficits. Most voters don't care either. They want lower taxes and all the benefits they get from the government. The government is addicted to tax cuts and spending increases for defense, Social Security, and Medicare, because that's what's popular. The US population is aging. There is no way old voters are going to vote for anyone that wants to cut SS and Medicare.
Inflation is the easiest political choice, because politicians can keep handing out feel good stimmies and tax cuts and blame others for the inflation that comes afterwards. This reinforces the bond bear market, as high inflation and high interest rates aren't enough to change political behavior. The only permanent break from this vicious cycle of high inflation and higher bond yields is political austerity. There are absolutely no signs of that happening.
During this secular bond bear market, there will be cyclical up moves in bonds. Just as there were cyclical down moves in bonds during the 40 year bond bull market from 1980 to 2020, there will be cyclical up moves in bonds during this bear market. Its going to need a trigger. The most obvious one is not the end of the Iran War. Its the end of the AI investment boom. The AI bust cycle is the only thing that will stop this bond bear market.
You will need a bear market in SPX to get a cyclical down move in bond yields. And most of that down move in yields will happen in the front end of the curve, with the Fed cutting rates, but because deficits will get bigger, long end yields will fall much less. While the crowd has been conditioned for equities to go higher when bonds go higher, it will be return of the inverse correlation that you saw for much of the dotcom era and post GFC. In order to get bonds higher, stocks need to go lower. Its ultimately the stock market that will determine the path of financial markets, not the bond market.
Retail aggressively buying TLT lately.
Global growth leading indicators are showing a slowdown for the next several months.











































