SPAC Boom

When the ducks are quacking, Wall Street comes to feed them.  And they are happily feeding them.

That chart was made 3 weeks ago, showing 208 SPAC IPOs YTD, it is 248 now.  so 40 SPAC IPOs have come out during that time.  Those 3 weeks, had more SPAC IPOs than any year from 2009 to 2017!   That is an average of 1 SPAC IPO per trading day in 2020, with the vast majority coming in the 2nd half.  

And why are they excited to buy these IPOs?  Here is the IPO performance over the past 10 years vs. the S&P 500.  The outperformance in 2020 is 1999-esque. 

And these SPACs, with their "blank checks", have to buy something to justify their existence.  And when you have so many SPACs competing to buy up companies that are the most popular on Wall Street, that probably means one thing:  overpaying for a lot of horrible EV related companies.   The counterargument could be that they could just not find a suitable company to buy so they'll return the money to investors if they can't find anything worth it.  Are you kidding me?  They'll buy any two-bit EV company, even if its run out of a garage.   Just like in 1999, when you have a sector that is suddenly hot and in demand by investors, supply is created one way or the other.  Either through SPAC acquisitions (now) or IPOs (1999).  

The important thing to remember about an IPO boom is not the amount of supply created by the initial issuance of shares, but the torrent of lockup expirations that happen 90-180 days later, bringing out even more supply than the initial wave of shares.  

Eventually, the hot demand for these EV and ESG names ends up creating a lot of bad supply, as in overpriced, hyped up, and unprofitable concept stocks that always sound great when there is no pressure to be profitable because all the revenue is supposed to be generated 3 to 5 years in the future, when supposedly everyone will be buying EVs and dumping their gasoline/diesel powered cars in a firesale to used car dealers. 

This EV boom is in many ways more ridiculous that the dotcom boom in 1998-2000.  At least with the internet, it was actually a disruptive technology that had a huge effect on businesses.  But EVs?  Really?  Are people's lives really going to change because they have an electric car instead of an ordinary gas powered one?  With the internet, the imagination could run wild with all the possibilities, and yet, not that many companies benefited.  With something far less consequential as EVs, its hard to imagine it changing much of anything. 

Electrics cars are a solution seeking out a problem that doesn't exist.  Last time I checked, electricity was mainly generated by burning coal and natural gas, and those create greenhouse gases just like burning gasoline and diesel.  Energy efficiencies are similar when you consider that while battery powered cars are more efficient than internal combustion engines, a lot of energy is lost in the converting coal/natural gas/renewables into electricity.  And the additional electricity demand from EVs will be mostly coming from coal, which is the cheapest, most abundant, and dirtiest.  So no, its not going to have much of an effect on greenhouse gases.

The parallels with the dotcom boom and the EV boom are eerily similar.  After a long bull market, that lasted 18 years (1982-2000) and at least 12 years (2009-2021?), investors throw caution to the wind and start to speculate like crazy on the latest hot technology.  This ends up creating a lot of IPOs to supply the demand.  From 1998 to 2000, IPOs were considered guaranteed big money profits for those who could get in at the offering price, as the IPO pops on the first day were huge and IPOs outperformed the broader market. 

And the speculation eventually spilled over to biotech and semiconductors in the later stages of the bubble in early 2000.  Recently, biotech stocks have been on fire, especially the speculative small cap names that retail investors are heavily involved with.  Semiconductor stocks have also done very well this year, and have easily  outperformed the Nasdaq composite over the past 3 months: 

The only question is what stage of the bubble are we in, using the 1998-2000 comparison.  Well we are definitely past the December 1998 stage when internet stocks were the new stock market favorites and IPOs were just starting to ramp up hot and heavy.  But I don't think we are at the December 1999 stage when almost all the people I knew who were investing were over the top bullish, Fed was tightening, and economy was roaring at the time.  

The Rona has probably extended this bubble by 12+ months because it just resulted in a flood of liquidity, as M2 has gone parabolic, with the combination of a Fed spewing tons of liquidity which is being spent by the government in the form of monster stimulus packages.  So I think we're probably in the middle of 1999 stage of this bubble, which probably means that there is still another 6 to 9 more months of this craziness before we hit the peak.  That timing coincides with the 180 day lockup expiration supply that should all come around the summer/fall of next year.  It should also coincide with the peak of the vaccine distribution and opening up of the economy, which will bring a euphoria of economic optimism along with a very overextended stock market.  

The crowd is already quite optimistic as it is, but when most of the Rona worries go to the rear view mirror, and investors start to talk more about pent up demand and excess savings, that would probably result in the irrational exuberance that would be the bell ringing at the top.  Until then, bulls have the edge.