In 1999, the market was enamored with companies that were internet based, that provided internet services, not the companies that provided the hardware and infrastructure for the internet. Only in late 1999 and early 2000 did the market started narrowing and focusing on the picks and shovels of the internet, as they realized that the internet would require a lot of capex investment. Semiconductors skyrocketed and went parabolic at the very end of the dotcom bubble. They were the last companies to boom higher.
This AI bubble has played out a bit differently as the biggest providers of AI are private companies, so they have skipped out on the early part of the bubble. If OpenAI was public when ChatGPT came out, they would have been a trillion dollar company by 2024. But due to easy capital available in private equity and less public scrutiny, they decided to stay private, probably because they were burning so much cash. Burning tens of billions of dollars and maintaining a high valuation is much easier to do when you are a private company than a public company. So with this bubble, its started with the hardware side but has expanded to peripheral hardware. From GPUs and data center energy plays to DRAM, storage, and more recently CPUs and networking. As you can see in the SOX performance in 2000 and its performance in 2026, there are some interesting parallels to the dotcom bubble.
![]() |
| SOX 1999 to 2001 |
![]() |
SOX 2025 to May 2026 |
MU actually was doing nothing for much of 1999, until it suddenly went parabolic in 2000. MU wasn't doing much for the first 8 months of 2025, and then it suddenly went parabolic starting in the fall of 2025. CSCO was the favorite big cap tech stock of the dotcom bubble, like NVDA is today. MU massively outperformed even CSCO at the end of the bubble.
![]() |
| MU (yellow) vs CSCO 2000 |
Expanding production capacity in memory takes years, so DRAM pricing is inelastic in the short to intermediate term. This inelasticity works both ways, as a sudden surge of demand causes a squeeze higher in prices, which then collapses when the demand cycle peaks and new production capacity starts coming online. A double whammy of higher production capacity and lower demand. It will happen again, but investors are blinded by the huge growth rates, the extreme profitably that makes these stocks look cheap on peak earnings in a hyper cyclical industry.
A new memory ETF, DRAM, which includes Samsung and SK Hynix, have received huge inflows over the past month. There is serious FOMO chasing the most volatile big cap tech stocks. It is rare to see a specialty ETF like DRAM attract as much inflows as SPY and QQQ over a week. There are blowoff top vibes when the crowd goes crazy over a small group of stocks like this into a parabolic rally.
Even some of the favorites during the dotcom bubble like CSCO and QCOM are joining the party, even though it would be a real stretch to consider those stocks AI infrastructure plays.
But is just the AI plays that are running. The rest of the SPX are lagging badly, and a big portion are below their 50 day and 200 day moving averages. Its a narrow market. Most are interpreting that as bearish, which is wrong. You had strong breadth in January, as Nasdaq lagged, and look what happened in February and March. Nasdaq is what matters, and in particular, the biggest cap stocks in NDX. People buy US stocks because of tech, not to get exposure to banks, health care, or consumer related stocks. If tech isn't performing, there is no reason to buy US stocks. You might as well buy cheaper European or Asian stocks that cover the same sectors.
You will know when a bear market is imminent when the Nasdaq starts lagging the SPX and breadth improves. That probably happens when the Strait opens and everyone gets complacent. Right now, you still have that wall of worry, that positive catalyst in the front view, which is the Strait opening and oil prices going lower.
There has been quite an increase in call speculation among small speculators (less than 10 options contract orders). Almost as high as late October, which was a local top.
Retail is also back with big inflows into tech. Now they are no longer interested in catching the falling software knife, and are piling into momentum names in tech hardware. It has just been one big week of inflows so far (as of May 6), so it may take a few more weeks for retail to get fully allocated and run out of dry powder.
We had some really bad inflation prints this week, with both CPI and PPI coming in hot. There are consequences from running fiscal deficits above 6% of GDP in an expansion. Add to that the $166B in tariff refunds going out this year, the lower tax rates from the OBBA going into effect, plus war spending. All that fiscal largesse is chasing the same number of goods and services, so naturally prices go up. Don't forget that the Fed is doing stealth QE as they buy tens of billions of T-bills every month to keep an ample reserve regime, and lessen the pressure in repo markets. It would be a surprise not to see high inflation in such an environment. US 10 year yields finally cracked above 4.50%, and JGB yields keep making new highs, now well above 2.5%. Higher bond yields are a feature, not a bug of a banana republic fiscal policy with no desire for less government spending or higher taxes.
Gold has effectively replaced US Treasuries for China, Russia, and a growing number of other emerging economies. Gold is slowly replacing Treasuries as the central bank reserve asset of choice, as the US government shows no desire to reign in massive budget deficits.
Despite the higher inflation and ever increasing fiscal deficits, I am not bearish on Treasuries at current levels. I see a couple of positive catalysts for the bond market. 1. Opening of the Strait. 2. The popping of the AI bubble. It may take some time for these catalysts to play out, but its a matter of when, not if. If I were to buy Treasuries, I would focus on short duration, as I see a curve steepening once the positive catalysts play out. Unlike the 2022 bear market, I expect the next equity bear market to be positive for bonds, as I expect the Fed to aggressively cut rates like Greenspan did in 2001 after the dotcom bubble burst. With so much of global wealth tied to the US stock market, I expect significant negative wealth effects from the next bear market.
The COT data for the week ending May 12 continues to show asset managers aggressively adding to their big net long SPX position. This is a very early warning sign of turbulent times ahead. Only after the asset manager positions have peaked and start going lower can you expect there to be a market top. It usually takes a couple of months for the market to trend lower after a peak in asset manager net longs.
Was waiting to get short SPX on an extended move higher, and we got that on Thursday, as SPX burst through 7500. Unfortunately, was waiting to short on Friday open and missed the entry due to the big gap down on bond yields shooting higher. We got significant dips in all the high beta tech plays in AI hardware/semiconductors on Friday. A lot of this pullback seems to be opex related, as the tickers with the biggest options volume and OI were all hit hard (NVDA, TSLA, AMD, MU).
With the one day pullback on Friday, not much to do, but wait for the market to get back to all time highs or even higher to pull the trigger on the short. Its still the higher probability play to buy dips in this market, as I expect dips to be shallow and bought quickly until you see the uptrend flatten out for a bit longer. The AI hardware plays should continue to be the ones that go up the most when the market bounces from these dips. Those with a bearish bias, who are adverse to playing bubbles from the long side should be patient, as I expect a grind higher for a few more weeks. That 4%+ pullback is probably something to expect in June or July.






















































