Pending Energy Crisis

After the US government/Fed money bazooka in 2020 and 2021, people lost their minds and went all in on garbage SPACs and investing in stuff that people don't need: crypto mining, fintech fantasies, EVs, etc.  The drop to negative oil prices created an illusion that oil demand had peaked and energy was plentiful.  Energy is only plentiful when you have hamfisted lockdowns.  In an normal environment, there is just not enough energy.  

After the brutal oil bear market in 2015-2016, capital expenditures at oil and gas producers were pared back to historically low levels, which became even lower after the lockdowns of 2020.  All the while the government kept printing enormous gobs of money in various forms of pork stimulus and helicopter drops.  People with lots of money, with no corresponding increase in productivity, speculating in bitcoin and FANG stocks, while energy companies battened down and spent as little capital as possible, trying to just survive.  Those are your ingredients for a future energy crisis.  And we are getting closer to the beginning of that energy crisis.

People forgot that the emerging markets still have a voracious appetite to increase their energy consumption, as its the quickest way to economic growth.  India, China, and Southeast Asia are still growing, they have hundreds of millions living in poverty that are working to increase consumption of goods and services, all of which require more energy.  For them, net zero and climate change are rich country problems, not something they can afford to worry about.  

As the US and Europe are shutting down their refineries, the Middle East and Asia are building new ones to satisfy the demand for diesel and gasoline.  The energy policy in the US and Europe, with its focus on renewables and its fantasy about peak fossil fuel demand, have resulted in a shortage of refinery capacity, leading to huge crack spreads and diesel prices that would normally happen with crude oil prices over $160/barrel, not $120.  

The shutting down of nuclear plants and replacing them with wind and solar has been a key factor in the huge demand growth for nat gas as a fuel source for power generation, even while the government makes it hard to build more gas pipelines out of existing gas fields, which are limited by midstream infrastructure, not production capacity.  

Above is a chart of global oil inventories, with Q2 shaded.  Q2 is normally a time for oil inventory builds, as its the shoulder season with refinery maintenance and less discretionary driving and heating needs.  But despite the China lockdowns (China oil demand decreased more than Russia oil exports decreased over the past 2 months), there have been oil inventory draws.  It is amazing to me to see net US inventory draws in Q2 despite SPR pumping out 1M barrels/day to try to balance the market. 

Even with the right government energy policies, it wasn't going to be easy to supply enough oil and gas to meet growing demand, but with the obsession over renewables and marginalization of future oil and gas production, as well as nuclear, the policy makers have exacerbated a bad situation and made it catastrophic.  The inventory declines in oil and seasonally low levels of nat gas in storage are huge warning signs that this is a long term problem, something that's not going to be fixed by SPR releases or additional production from OPEC+, which is pumping near total capacity.  It can only be ameliorated by aggressive oil and gas exploration and capital spending to increase production, which will only pay dividends several years later, due to long lead times.  Shale oil production has peaked, and it was never a long term solution anyway due to low recoverable reserves and high decline rates.  

We've had warnings from MSFT and TGT, and INTC talking down their quarter.  All in the past week.  And we're not even in the heart of Q2 earnings warning season, which is late June.  The market has traded sideways and have bounced back after these bad news announcements, but what's more important is that the market is wasting time during this rally window to get to higher levels.  In a bear market, there is only so much time that the market can rally before the bearish forces return and the predominant trend continues.  There was a lot of carnage in April and May, so it makes sense that there is a countertrend rally and a period to consolidate the losses, but that reprieve won't last much longer.  I give it until the FOMC meeting next Wednesday, and then things should get shaky again for this market.  Seasonally, things are weak after triple witching opex, and that's coming up starting next Friday.  

I am looking to put on shorts if we get a rally after the CPI number is released tomorrow.  Target for short entries are between 12800-13000 in NDX.  

Not Reinventing the Wheel

“I’ve Never Made A Play Up. You Just Steal From Other Coaches. Brad Stevens Draws Up Great Stuff. Dave Joerger Runs Really Good Stuff Too.” - Steve Kerr, Golden State Warriors head coach 

The internet is a great equalizer.  Institutions used to have a huge information advantage back in the old days.  And most of the information is free, and people willingly give away valuation information, which is sort of their way of doing philanthropy.  I know there are many traders that don't like to reveal how they make money, or give out their investment ideas, thinking that letting others know will dilute their edge, or make it go away if too many people trade it.  But even if you give people a profitable trade idea or strategy, most of them will figure out a way to make it much less profitable or even unprofitable. 

My experience from talking to other investors, who trade their own money, most of them who are just dabbling part time, is that they have pretty big egos, and often don't follow recommendations, or if they do, only partially.  People like to do their own thing, and think they are usually right.  That's why investors like to hold on to losers, not just because they don't want to admit defeat, but its because they think they are right, even when the market is telling them they aren't.  I actually fall into that trap myself.  Although I've gradually improved at admitting defeat and taking the loss.

A few months ago, I spoke to an acquaintance, a novice investor.  He asked me what he thought were a good investment, and I mentioned a few oil and gas stocks.  I gave him my reasoning, and he bought a couple of them, but then promptly took a profit a month later, saying that they went up quickly and he thought they were short term overbought.  I told him I was still long, but he clearly didn't have the same view. In fact, he actually shorted an oil ETF after the Russian invasion, when WTI was around 110, because the chart looked overbought, despite my pleas to not short oil.  Last time I spoke with him, he was still short.  

This gets back to information that you find on the internet.  There is a lot of bad or irrelevant information out there, so its hard to separate signal from noise.  But what I've noticed is that you would be surprised how often widely available information is actually not fully priced into the market.  

Investing is not reinventing the wheel, a lot of its looking around, finding other people's good ideas, doing some due diligence, and making an investment.  Not much creativity or direct hands on research is involved, a lot of it is just stealing other people's stock ideas.  But that's the tricky part, because you have to pick the right people to follow, a lot of people are just talking their book, and not being rigorous or objective about the investment prospects of a stock.  There's a lot of misinformation, bad research out there.  Honestly, I'm much better at picking and choosing who to follow, figuring out what is good research than I am at actually doing good research myself. 

This brings me to the commodities market.  The underperformance of commodities vs US equity indexes since 2008 have biased people's views and asset allocation.  Despite the overtly bullish fundamental supply/demand situation that's developed over the past few months, there doesn't seem to be a huge rush of capital flowing to the energy sector.  I think most of the recent strength has not been from eager new buyers, but from corporate buybacks and those already invested less willing to sell at current prices.  

At first, I was also skeptical about a new up cycle in commodities, in particular oil, after the big drop in 2020 because I was expecting OPEC+ to cheat, and boost production much more quickly than they did, keeping inventories high.  They were actually quite disciplined in staying under their quotas, a change from past behavior, which went a long way towards eating away at the inventory surplus that had built up in the the first half of 2020.  By late 2021, global oil demand had basically come back to pre Covid levels, even without much international travel to Asia and even some parts of Europe, so I knew the inventories were going to have a hard time building back up. 

All the research reports and articles from informed sources in the energy space were coming to the same conclusion: supply was not able to keep up with demand.  Capital investment in future production was low and not growing, even as prices were going higher, and demand was going up much faster than expected in the emerging markets.  Perhaps it was due to the big drops in oil prices from late 2014 to early 2016, in late 2018, and in spring 2020 that gave pause to oil company CEOs from spending more money on investment and exploration, and they stayed conservative and disciplined.  

 

Due to the natural decline of oil wells, especially shale oil, you need continuous capital investment to maintain production, and that's not happening.  In the above chart, you can see the drop in capital expenditures from 2014 to 2021 is steep for 3 large oil producers.  Whether its scars from oil bear markets, peak oil demand concerns or ESG compliance, oil & gas companies have dramatically reduced capital spending in the past few years.  That's not a good sign for oil supply.  Most oil projects that are not shale require a few years to ramp up production, and its safe to say that most of the easy pickings have been drilled, so the stuff that's left over is going to take longer and require more investment.  

There is lots of other research that have confirmed both less capital investment, higher than expected demand in emerging markets, and relatively inelastic demand in developed economies to higher gas prices (much higher than implied by crude oil prices, due to extremely high crack spreads).  And that's not even mentioning the ridiculous energy policies in Europe and America, that have focused on renewables and have shut down nuclear power plants, slowing the growth of power generation capacity, increasing demand for natural gas, even to the point that natural gas was twice as expensive as oil in Europe, prompting power companies to switch from gas to oil.   

From everything I read, from reviewing the data, from the price action in oil, natural gas, and coal, it all points to a super tight market for energy.  An energy shortage looks to be inevitable, its a perfect storm where the market can only be balanced in the short term by demand destruction.  And energy demand is much less elastic than people think.  People in America complain about $5-6/gallon gas, but that would be considered an absolute bargain in Europe.   Its going to take a big sustained increase in energy prices to get the required demand destruction to balance this market.  It won't be able lean on SPR releases, or count on China regularly locking down and keeping a zero Covid policy forever.

The plan is to hedge my energy longs with shorts in NDX and overpriced tech (ARKK, TSLA, etc.) after the CPI on Friday.  Still giving the bulls more room to roam, I have a feeling that they'll get excited and bullish after the CPI report this Friday.  Also you tend to get that upward drift into the FOMC meeting in the days ahead of it.  Plus VIX expiration, which will close out a lot of VIX call options, more than puts of course, which should help to suppress vol next week.

Follow Your Long Term View

In this game, you have to learn from your mistakes and play to your strengths.  I've learned over the years what my strengths and weaknesses are.  And they are not conducive for daytrading.  Like a lot of newbie traders, I am bad at taking losses, which is deadly if you are daytrading.  But less so if you are position sizing smaller and looking at longer time frames.  

I thought about all the mistakes I've made this year and they all began when I tried to play for short term moves which were in the opposite direction of my long term view.  Earlier in the year, I thought Treasuries were short term oversold but knew that they were likely to go down more later, and lost.  I was a bit too early in buying the dip in SPX during the weakness in February, even though I knew the bubble was about to burst soon, and lost.  I thought the SPX would have a longer counter trend rally off the bottom in March and bought the dip in early April, expecting a short term bounce higher and lost.  In all those instances, my short term view of the market was the opposite of my longer term view.  

Its a lesson that was learned from previous experiences, but forgotten, since I was usually playing on the long side of SPX from late 2020, and my short term view was the same as my longer term view of the market for quite a while.  

My longer term view of the SPX is bearish, so unless things get really oversold and panicky, I am avoiding the long side.  Still haven't taken an outright short on the market, as I was giving the bulls the benefit of the doubt and giving them room to see how high they could take the market.  And they have disappointed me.

The price action this week has revealed a lot.  We haven't gotten an extension higher off the furious 3 day rally from Wed. 5/25 to Fri. 5/27.  Instead, the market has decided to go back down and test the lower end of the range for those rally days.  The less time the market spends at the recent highs, the less strength its showing.  The overnight rally on Monday that took SPX up to 4200 was quickly sold off during the regular hours on Tuesday and Wednesday.  We got a strong rally off the dip on Thursday despite the MSFT earnings warning and have taken most of that back today.  

In the end, the long term fundamentals of this market has not changed.  The Fed will stay on their rate hike course even though the signs of a slowing economy are growing.  Investors are still in hope mode, hoping that the Fed is less hawkish, that they are closer to their dovish pivot, hoping that a slowing economy and inflation peaking will make the Fed less aggressive in their tightening.  But none of the economic data this week will allow the Fed to make a pivot anytime soon, even though I do expect them to cave in eventually when stocks go much lower.  But here is the important thing:  stocks have to go much lower before they cave in!  If stocks stay here or go higher, the Fed will put on a brave face and act tough, because the only time they get nervous is not when inflation is high, its when stocks are low. 

Words and Actions Diverge

Fads and manias come and go, but in the end, the fundamentals eventually determine price.  Its tempting to see stocks down 30-50% and think you are getting a bargain, a half off sale, without looking at the fundamentals.  When you had people losing their minds, willing to pay up for flavors of the day, regardless of valuations, you get charts that look like this:

 

 

There are many that get caught up in trying to buy a dip, confusing the tendency for the stock indices to mean revert, and extrapolating that to individual stocks and ETFs.  The temptation of buying something at much cheaper prices than where it was trading a few weeks ago.  In actuality, individual stocks tend to trend for long periods of time, both up and down.  As the posterboy for this bubble, ARKK has managed to attract $1.4B in fund inflows YTD despite going from 97 to 45 in less than 5 months.  And the 3x Nasdaq 100 ETF, TQQQ, has managed to attract $8.3B in flows YTD while it went from 85 to 33.  The most popular sector since 2020, tech stocks, is still attracting huge inflows in their most speculative ETF.  

This is where words don't equal actions.  In all these sentiment surveys that show lots of bears, you never see what these survey respondents are actually doing with their money.  The actions of the public still show that there are many buying the dip and taking bullish actions. 

 

Now let's take a look at what people think are crowded trades, because prices are going up, where supposedly everyone is bullish: the energy sector.  

 

 

Since these ETFs are going up, the assumption is that investors are taking bullish actions.  But since the start of 2021 to now, a period when oil went from $48 to $115, and XOP went from $58 to $157, there have been net fund outflows.  The opposite of what's happened with ARKK and TQQQ. 

Being contrarian doesn't mean fighting the trend.  And talking bullish and acting bullish are two different things.  

We have gotten a huge squeeze higher in the SPX over the past 3 days, catching me by surprise.  It is setting up for a good risk/reward scenario on the short side in the coming weeks.  I though NDX 12600-12800 would be a good short level, but considering how quickly it got up to that level, I will give it a few more days to see how far the bulls are willing to bid up the tech stocks, which is where I want to be on the short side.  

 

Perhaps we'll get investors all bulled up about a possible Fed September pause after the nonfarm payrolls disappoints (June 3) and CPI inflation starts trending lower (June 10).  Both of those are likely to happen, as employment slows down and the government starts to actively manipulate CPI lower ahead of the midterm elections.  But I expect Powell to stick with the hawkish talk at the June FOMC meeting (June 15) for now as the SPX has recovered sharply off the lows and food/energy prices keep going higher.  So possible strength up to June 15 (probably tops out before that, but open to a longer bear bounce), and then a resumption of the downtrend and new lows, breaking SPX 3800 later this summer. 

Micromanagers

The Fed can't get out of their own way.  They are worst type of manager.  The micromanager.  Always having to do something.  Always saying too much.  Always reacting to the markets. Remember, their forward guidance is worth the amount that you paid for it, nothing.  They are the same clowns that predicted zero rates until 2023.  Team Transitory throughout 2021.

Apparently, the Fed is starting to feel some heat.  Not from the inflation readings.  From the weak stock market.  That inflation fight isn't so urgent, even with a CPI reading at 8.3%.  The stock market selloff has shaken their convictions.  All the permabears calling for a recession has infected their psyche, their fear of a hard landing.  At less than 1% Fed funds, there is already talk of a pause!  While you had the highest CPI in decades.  You can't make this stuff up.  No wonder the market always believes the Fed is eventually going to come to the rescue.  That's been conditioned into investors since 1987.  

The Fed clearly doesn't fear high inflation.  They probably think its still transitory, and if they just talk about fighting inflation, the inflation will just go away.  They believe their own BS about supply chains eventually resolving and lowering prices.  I'm sure they'll find a way to blame Putin and the war for the inflation, to absolve themselves of any responsibility for this mess.  Powell is about as nonchalant as can be when he makes these rate moves.  He does the minimum expected, and is loathe to surprise the market with anything too hawkish.  He says he's worried about inflation, but he doesn't act like it.  Going for 25 bps in March even as commodity prices were surging higher along with the CPI because of Russia/Ukraine.  Taking 75 bps off the table at the May meeting.  What's his next dovish stunt?  Talking about pausing the rate hikes later in the year to observe how the rate hikes are digested?  

Its almost as if he's an ambulance driver on some scenic drive, taking his time getting to the destination, stopping here and there, smelling the roses, taking pictures, while the destination is a disaster area, filled with masses of injured and dying.  There is no urgency to hike rates.  There is a huge mismatch between action and words.  

A hard landing for the stock market is in process.  With the valuation excess, its unavoidable, even with Powell having a Bernanke moment, cutting rates to zero while inflation is high and then going to QE again.  The Fed cutting rates in 2001 didn't stop the market from going down for another 18 months.  The Fed cutting rates in 2007/2008 didn't stop the market from going down for another 17 months.  

We're not even at that stage, the Fed is still tightening!  That's what's so crazy about this market, its skipped all the steps required for a classical bear market, and gone straight to a bear market as soon as the Fed started hiking rates.  That's usually happening in the middle of a bull market, not at the start of a bear market.  That's how late Powell has been.  

This is unlike any Fed cycle I've ever seen.  Its a 1970s type of environment, which most investors have no idea how to trade.  In the 1970s, stocks and bonds were poor investments, and commodities were great investments.  The macro environment feels like 1973, and the investor asset allocation feels like 2000. 

With the Fed so late, by default, they will be late to cut rates, although I do expect them to eventually get to zero and do QE again by 2024.  Even with high inflation.  But the market will have to stay in a bear market and continue to trend down, like I expect for several more months before the Powell pivot.  Will he pivot to try to prevent a hard landing in September?  October?  My bet is on September.  I don't think he'll let the markets keep going down, it makes him nervous.  Clearly high inflation doesn't.  

A huge rally over the last 2 days, and gapping up in pre market.  I sold all of my index longs yesterday, a bit too early.  Now waiting for the bulls to get overaggressive on the long side to short NDX.  12600-12800 is my ideal entry point for a NDX short.  Expecting the Nasdaq tech names to be lagging the market until the Powell pause. 

No Credibility

Let's get one thing straight:  the Fed has no credibility on inflation.  There are many out there who believe that the Fed will keep hiking until they break something but they don't have the balls for that.  Or the courage to take the economic pain to lower inflation.  Already, you are hearing a Fed governor talk about a pause in September with CPI at 8.2%!  These guys are more scared of a hard landing disinflationary environment with tight financial conditions than they are of a slow burn high inflation environment with easy financial conditions.  

They are scarecrows.  They talk a tough game, but don't play a tough game.  And they are so late, that they are early.  What that means is that they are so late to tighten, that they've missed their rate hiking window as the bubble economy has peaked out.  And that makes their current rate path and balance sheet well suited to a downturn.  They now won't have to hike as much as priced into the market because the economy is already weakening.  Thus, since they never went to a restrictive policy rate, they don't have to ease right away and look weak on inflation, because they never tightened enough in the first place.  Instead of having a 2+% Fed funds rate from early 2021 to early 2023, like they should have, they will instead have a 2+% Fed funds rate from mid 2022 to early 2023, so 18 months less of tight financial conditions, and then they will gleefully cut from 2+% down to zero when facing a growth scare in 2023/2024.  

So Powell will have managed to do a lot of talking, with very little action and with only a brief period of rates at a "neutral" rate, before going back to the default easy money policy and zero rates at the first hint of slowing growth, regardless of inflation.  The bond market is already starting to sniff this out as the Eurodollars market is getting inverted in 2023, with Jan 2024 Eurodollars priced higher than Jan 2023 eurodollars, basically meaning that STIRs markets are forecasting rate cuts in 2023.  

What does this mean for markets for the next 12 months?  It means that you won't get the capitulation that everyone is looking for because the Fed will try to steer this plane away from a hard landing, by not getting financial conditions tight enough.  In the process, inflation will remain higher, commodities prices will keep going higher, and the dollar will go lower.  The yield curve will steepen, as short term rates go down and long term rates less so as the Fed tolerates a higher inflation environment.  Stocks will be the trickiest part because stocks love a Fed that doesn't tighten financial conditions, but at the same time, you have a massive overweight in US stocks among both US and foreign investors, high valuations, and corporate margins under pressure from higher labor costs.  

The federal government spending will still be quite stimulative in 2023, so if the Fed steps off the gas, you probably have a range bound market with slightly lower highs and lows for the next 12 months.  This is assuming what I think Powell will do, which is raise 50 bps at the next 2 meetings, taking Fed funds up to 1.75-2.00%, and maybe doing 1 or 2 hikes of 25 bps in Sep/Oct/Dec, and then saying job is done, congratulating himself for "fighting inflation" and having an appropriate rate for the current economy, which the market will love, and you probably get a 2-3 month rally, and then everyone will look around and see that inflation is still high, and the economy still sucks, and then the markets will have another Wylie Coyote moment as another waterfall decline emerges from the complacency.  This will get Powell panicked and looking for ways to placate a market having a temper tantrum because he's not cutting rates and rates are still above 2%.  Powell will then go into bazooka/hero ball mode, cutting like hell down to zero.  

This market is all Fed all the time, so that's the only thing that matters.  Earnings are just a distraction.  The meme of this bubble era is the Fed, so they are the drivers of all short to intermediate term moves.  Long term moves are driven by valuations, which are still not favorable here.  

With a spineless Fed, you will not see capitulation for quite a while, so don't bet on it for 2022.  Inflation/commodity prices stay high, although base effects/additional CPI manipulation will help to lower the CPI number which will be a convenient excuse for the Fed to pat themselves on the back and talk about how their measly few rate hikes and tough talk are working, even when they aren't. 

Its a choppy market, no V bottoms, lots of time spent lingering near the lows.  This is a continuing theme for 2022.  Rallies don't last for more than 1 or 2 days.  The margin for error is much narrower for bulls, and much wider for bears.  This is the mirror image from 2009 to 2021.  Trade accordingly.  

The high put/call ratios support the case for a short term tradable bounce, but the fund flows data / COT futures positioning data shows investors stubbornly holding on to overweight equity long positions.  Maybe a few weeks of sideways trade from 3800 to 4100 and then a steady grind move down towards 3600 in the late summer to force the Fed's hand into pausing at the September FOMC meeting. 

US Outperformance is Over

 We are seeing a new pattern that investors are not used to.  Ever since 2008, coming out of the financial crisis, the US equity market has continuously outperformed other countries and by a large margin.  That has drastically changed in the past 6 weeks.  Since the start of April, the US has been a huge laggard.  

DAX vs SPX 2022

Nikkei 225 vs SPX 2022

Shanghai Composite vs SPX 2022

MSCI Brazil ETF vs SPX 2022

We have finally made the turn, and the market has done its job.  It has created the most liquidity and volume for US stocks at the top for US outperformance, which now looks to be 2021.  That is a 13 year window of outperformance for US stocks that ended with a blowoff top of epic proportions, as everyone across the globe herded into big cap tech (AAPL, AMZN, MSFT, GOOG, FB, NFLX, TSLA, NVDA, etc.) or into the big 2 US indices: S&P 500 / Nasdaq 100.  Those have now become the worst performers, as the underperformance has accelerated over the past 6 weeks.  

There are fundamental headwinds for US stocks which weren't present in the last 13 years.  We're now in a structurally higher inflation environment with tight commodities markets keeping goods prices high and a massive federal budget deficits which keeps demand artificially high while also keeping money supply growth high.  Labor markets are tighter as immigration has trended lower in the US and population has gotten older.  This keeps wages higher and gives workers more bargaining power than at anytime in the last 13 years.  Higher wages = lower profit margins.  Higher inflation = less dovish Fed.  I am not a believer that they will try to kill inflation with big rate hikes and very tight policy.  They will cave in as soon as the economy slows down enough for people to start complaining about high interest rates and lower stocks.  However, they will have a hard time going to QE and rationalizing easy money policies if rents, food, and energy prices keep going higher. 

Without QE, I don't see a sustained uptrend in the SPX until all the froth is gone, which would be around the SPX 3000 level.  At SPX 3900, the forward P/E is 16.5.  

The SPX bottomed at a forward P/E of 14 in 2002, at a forward P/E of under 9 in 2008, under 11 in 2011, and under 14 in 2018.  A drop in the forward P/E to 14 would take the SPX to 3300.  That is assuming that foward earnings remain the same.  But forward earnings estimates seem wildly optimistic, so even a 10% drop in earnings, which seems reasonable considering the slowing economy and falling profit margins, would require the SPX to get down to 3000 to reach a forward P/E of 14.  And I haven't even gotten to the worst case scenario of a 2008 or 2011 situation, where forwards P/Es got down to 9 and 11, respectively.  

So while many market participants seem to now agree that we are in a bear market, many are still looking for a bounce as the markets look like they are oversold.  The trend is down, as the US underperformance and post bubble dynamics reveal. Its hard to make money going long the SPX in that environment.  When the market gives you this many changes to go long near the lows, its a sign of weakness.  Rarely in the past 13 years did the market offer so many chances to buy the lows as this one has.  

Sold the short term long SPX trade for a small gain on Friday, still have a small legacy SPX long left which I will look to sell on a bounce.  Still waiting for that elusive and fleeting short opportunity in NDX. 

Recency Bias

The behavior of human beings is easily conditioned, but it takes time.  At our core, we are just chimps with slightly bigger brains.  The stock market is both a giant casino and a nonstop crowd psychology experiment.  Recency bias keeps the crowd more focused on recent data points when markets had a waterfall decline (2020, 2018, 2015/2016, 2011) than older data points (2000-2002, 1973-1974). 

In 2020, you had a decline from top to bottom that lasted less than 2 months.  The Fed came to the rescue with bazooka QE and the US government did the biggest stimmy spew ever.  That was just 2 years ago, so that bias of the Fed coming to the rescue whenever the market plummets is still seared into the heads of investors.  60/40 stock/bond portfolios had a blockbuster performance, as 10 year Treasury yields got down to 0.36%.  

In 2018, you had a decline from top to bottom that lasted less than 3 months.  The Fed once again came to the rescue, this time, calling off future rate hikes that was priced into the market and making a dovish pivot and signaling future rate cuts in January 2019.  The market never looked back and grinded higher for several months after the December 24 2018 bottom.  60/40 did ok during the waterfall decline, and especially well in 2019, as both stocks and Treasuries rallied huge throughout the year.  

In 2015/2016, you had an up down up down move that lasted less than 2 months each, each one around 15%, so rather mild, and then followed by a relentless rally that lasted several months.  This time too, the Fed turned dovish, calling off rate hikes and pausing after doing a measly 25 bps in December 2015.  60/40 had a huge 6 month performance for the first half of 2016, as 10 yr Treasury yields went to all time lows at the time at 1.32%.  

In 2011, you had a decline from top to bottom that lasted less than 5 months, and with Treasuries going through the roof during the European debt crisis, providing a perfect hedge for equity longs.  The Fed embarked on Operation Twist, basically QE by lengthening the duration of their holdings, buying long duration Treasuries by selling T-bills.  60/40 portfolios held up very well during the whole downturn.  

So the last 4 waterfall declines were all brief, and followed by the Fed caving in to the market and making a dovish pivot.  Stocks bottomed and surged higher in the following months.  Treasuries rallied huge during all 4 declines and commodity prices went down even more than stocks during all 4.  That is the foundation for the psychology of today's investor.  They expect the Fed to come to the rescue, and that the market will rally huge for several months afterwards.  So they aren't giving up, and also aren't throwing in the towel on bets that Treasuries will go higher.  

That recency bias keeps many investors from worrying about a possible extended bear market, which is the more likely scenario based on the exuberance over stocks in the last few years, similar to what you saw in the early 1970s and late 1990s.  

Few people remember or consider what happened in 2000-2002, and even fewer what happened in 1973-1974.  Extended bear markets, with very few bear market rallies, basically stair step down for months until the final puke phase 2 years after the top.  Absolutely brutal markets for buy and hold investors, and just bad overall for permabulls. 

The SPX in 2000-2002:

The SPX in 1973-74:

I see 2022 as a combination of 2000 and 1973.  You had the dotcom bubble in 2000, and you had the bitcoin/big cap tech/ARKK speculative tech/meme stock bubble in 2021.  You had surging oil prices/inflation, as well as the Nifty Fifty in 1973.  You have surging oil prices/inflation and FANG/big cap tech in 2021-2022.  

Another savage selloff on Wednesday.  This market doesn't stop at down 2 or 3%.  It goes for blood, and goes down 4+%.  Huge chunks taken right back after the bulls got excited about a technical rally after the bottom last Thursday.  Even with my bearish tilt, I've been way too bullish on the short term time horizon, and have been waiting for a rally towards 4150 to short SPX and dump everything, including energy.  But the market trades like there are a million bagholders looking to sell rallies, which kills them before they can gather steam and lure in more suckers.  Just savage.

I will take a shot to put on some SPX longs today into this big gap down, but only for small size, matching my level of confidence on the long side. 

Powell: Caveman Lawyer

There seems to be a dominant frame developing in the market, one of a sharp growth slowdown and a probable 2023 recession, with inflation peaking soon.  I agree about the sharp growth slowdown, but don't agree with the recession or inflation peaking (not the  manipulated CPI, but real actual inflation numbers) calls.  

When it comes to the economy, with a Fed that's not willing to take the pain necessary with big time rate hikes (up to 5% Fed funds) to kill inflation, only fiscal policy will be able to cause enough of a growth slowdown to result in a recession.  And the budget deficit will be over 6% of GDP for 2022, and only glide down to about 5% of GDP for 2023.  That's quite expansionary, so the methamphetamine kick will still be there, just not as high as 2021. 

Rising energy prices won't do it.  A slowdown in corporate profits won't do it.  Raising rates from 0 to 2.5% is not going to get the job done.  Its like trying to bail water out of a sinking boat with a shot glass.  There is still too much liquidity sinking the boat.  So a slowdown in capex spending, some corporate layoffs at the margin, and higher mortgage rates enough to cause a recession?  If the budget deficit was close to 0, I would agree about the recession calls.  But its not.  Nowhere even close to a balanced budget.  

We underestimate the stimulative effect of big budget deficits.  Its free money raining down on the economy.  Normally during an economic expansion, like you have in 2021 and 2022, budget deficits are low, as tax receipts go up.  But the spending and handouts was so enormous, and the spending is still heavy, for the foreseeable future.  Projections of a budget deficit of 5% to 7% for the next 5 years.  In the EU, they get all worked about going over 2% deficit to GDP, so the fiscal juice in the US is on a whole another level compared to other developed nations.

American exceptionalism is not high tech, its lots of government pork masking a structually low growth economy with little productivity increases and slowing population growth due to lower immigration levels.  

To really kill inflation, the US needs to either raise taxes, reduce government spending, or a combination of both.  Social Security and Medicare need to be massively reduced.  Same for defense spending.  That's just not happening.  The US is well on the MMT road and the US dollar will start losing its reserve currency status as the deficits continue to get out of control, and Fed eventually has to monetize all of it in order to save the financial markets.  

Mini me monetary tightening by Mr. Caveman Lawyer Powell will not get the results they want.  They need to meaningfully curtail demand by decreasing the number of dollars in circulation.  Talking tough is just a CYA (cover your ass) exercise to save face.  They will continue to make minimal moves that are more bark than bite.  Powell is not that guy to put the inflation genie back in the bottle.  He will cave under pressure, like he did in early 2019, even as his colleagues talk a hawkish game.  Caving is in his DNA.  Its in his survival instinct.  High inflation or low inflation, when his back is against the wall and financial markets are having a temper tantrum, he will go back to his familiar role of being the market's sugar daddy.  He can't take the criticism.  Inflation could be totally out of control and he will still cut rates if the stock market crashes.  Guaranteed.  

I am noticing a sea change in the psychology of market participants over the past few days.  The bullishness is going up on a short term time frame, as its become consensus that the market is oversold and due for a bear market rally, and more people are coming around to my view that we are in indeed in a bear market.  Based on the huge amount of inflows into stocks in 2020 and 2021, and the high % of household net worth invested in stocks, I only see corporations providing a bid to the market with buybacks, while retail and institutions will be reluctant to add to their holdings in stocks, since they are already at a historically high level.  More likely than not, we'll see retail outflows as they pass the denial stage and lurch towards acceptance. 

I continue to feel the post dotcom bubble 2000 vibes in this market, so its a dangerous market for buying dips, and even more dangerous for chasing rallies.  Bitcoin and crypto currencies are the poster boy for excessive speculation in previously unthinkable investments, which became extremely popular in 2020 and 2021.  Expecting a painful slide lower for bitcoin for the next 2 years.  

For the overall market, best case scenario, I see a bounce up to SPX 4200 and a resumption of the downtrend after that bounce.  Worse case scenario, we top out this week and continue to grind lower towards 3600 for the rest of the summer.  This market is tailor made for short sellers, and selling rallies will be profitable until Powell cries uncle and gives up on 50 bp rate hikes, signaling a slowdown in the tightening cycle, probably coming at the September FOMC meeting.  So until then, rallies will be brief, IMO.  

We have a big gap up today, I have a small "legacy" position in SPX which I will be looking to clear out this week, so may sell it today or tomorrow.  Still holding energy, as I am a long term believer in the inflation trade. 

A Savage Market

The selling is relentless.  They will let it breathe for a couple of hours and then the sellers come back with a vengeance, gleefully selling bounces to suckers who chase strength.  At this rate, chasers who buy up moves who have been getting hammered will go bankrupt in a few weeks as nothing lasts on the upside.  Haven't seen this kind of relentless selling since 2008, and before that, the 2000-2002 bear market.  

The market trades so heavy, as if there are millions of bagholders looking to sell on any uptick, while the support is weak, as the dip buyers have been getting buried and are running out of dry powder.  The marginal seller is much more eager to get his orders through than the marginal buyer.  That is showing up in lower highs and lower lows.  

At this point, the selling begets selling, as weak hands are shaken out and people are just getting tired of losing money every day and some are just throwing in the towel.  I thought we might have a day or two of rallying based on the bounce off of another hot CPI number, but that rally failed like all the other ones for the last 5 weeks.  

Amidst the doom and gloom, there is a glimmer of hope from the market going down too fast too quickly, which is setting up a slingshot bounce play once bottom is hit.  I thought 3950 would prove to be a strong support area, and it did produce a 90 point bounce yesterday off that number, but it was faded all day.  There is a lot of support in the 3850-3900 zone, with 3850 being 20% down from the highs, and 3900 being a heavily traded area in early 2021 before the market went parabolic.  

The bounce back up to 4400-4500 looks like a pipe dream now.  Its not going to happen.  At best, I see a bounce up towards 4150-4200, where I expect sellers to swarm the market like flies to shit.  Its a fully entrenched bear market, something investors are just not accustomed to.  They are used to bear markets lasting 3-4 months (2011, 2016, 2018, 2020), and are probably expecting similar things this time around.  I see very few expecting a long extended bear market like the post dotcom bubble period of 2000-2002, or the financial crisis period from 2007 to 2009. 

I am trading under the expectation that we are in a post-bubble 2000 like environment, so position sizing is everything.  Buying on dips will be small, and only focused on extreme short term selling points where a probability of a bounce are high (like right now).  Shorting into rallies will be big, and concentrated in the most popular sectors during the bubble, in particular, technology stocks.  So I am waiting to put on big size only for short positions, and in the NDX, while buying dips in this type of environment will be focused on the strongest sector which have outperformed, and which I expect to continue to outperform, energy.  I bought some on the dip yesterday, but for small size, and will look to add if SPX gets towards that 3850-3870 area.  

No need to be a hero when buying dips, its not a bull market anymore, so you have to be cautious on longs, and can only be aggressive on shorts. 

Its Payback Time

There is no free lunch with money printing.  The MMT supporters had their time to shine in 2020 while crude went negative amidst the biggest Fed QE + Rona stimmy fest double barrel bazooka ever.  They thought all the money spew wouldn't result in inflation.  They felt invincible.  They were right for a few months.  Gradually, and then suddenly, they've been completely wrong.  Team Transitory along with their MMT cousins have quietly slinked off in the corner, never mentioning that phrase again, for fear of ridicule. 

Inflation is a monetary phenomena.  Its not about temporary blips like supply chain problems or war, its about the supply of money chasing a fixed amount of goods and services. I am sure Powell and all the economists would disagree with me, but they are paid whether they are right or wrong, comfy in their ivory towers.  When I'm wrong, I feel the pain right away in the form of losses.  When they're wrong, they find something convenient to blame (supply chains, Putin, China lockdowns, etc.) or nonchalantly sweep it under the rug. 

People tend to overcomplicate things, or just parrot the media, who blame everything on supply chains for the inflation.  It all comes down to the money.  The US has been the most aggressive nation for both fiscal and monetary stimulus since 2020.  They doused everything with a firehose of liquidity and free money, and thought of themselves as heroes.  And they've ended up with the highest inflation among all the  developed nations.  Powell was revered as a great central banker who saved the financial world with his QE bazooka.  All he did was kick off the biggest bubble in US financial market history, even worse than Greenspan, and waited 2 years to start undoing what he started.  Even the ever late to tighten Greenspan took back the fall 1998 rate cuts with rate hikes 12 months later.  

Mr. Transitory, Jerome Powell, has managed to be about as bad as Bazooka Ben Bernanke, the Time Man of the Year, a guy who delayed normalization and rate hikes to the next chairman, so the shit didn't hit the fan on his watch.  Doves are celebrated.  Hawks are criticized.  That's the world that central bankers live in, and they are incentivized to print at the slightest sign of economic weakness.  Its the easy way out.  And they've abused the printing press resulting in what will be a long period of inflation, that will confound the deflationistas, who are still stuck in the 1980 to 2020 mindset of falling yields, regardless of the fundamentals.

This time, unlike the 1980-2019 time period, the budget deficit is now a significant % of GDP, which is inflationary, especially when the Fed is so willing to provide the funding for all that pork.  You need a proportional increase in production to compensate for the increase in money, otherwise, prices will rise.  With the dollar as the reserve currency, that exorbitant privilege has kept inflation lower than it would have been otherwise, but there are limits.  Eventually, foreign nations will see that the US government is doing its best to debase the dollar, and will be much less willing to finance their debt at low interest rates, leaving the Fed to be the main buyer.  That eventually erodes trust in the US dollar, which looks like the king now, but it looked like that in 2000 as well.  And by 2008, it looked like the euro had overtaken it as the EURUSD rate went from parity to 1.58. 

Right now, there is no concern about the dollar because of its relative strength vs. the euro, yen, and most foreign currencies.  But watch what happens when Powell makes his dovish pivot, which is a matter of if, not when.  That's when you will see the confidence start to disappear.  Its not while they are tightening, because the market over projects the rate hiking path and overrate the Fed's inflation fighting credibility.  Powell has no credibility on inflation.  He's folded quickly to pressure before.  He's been too late to hike.  He's all but told you that he won't try to shock the market to get ahead of the inflation curve.  And the bond market initially liked, but then thought about it, and didn't like the lack of backbone and inflation fighting that Powell communicated.  

The bond market is starting to see the writing on the wall, that inflation will remain sticky, and would prefer the Fed rip off the band-aid, instead of pulling it off slowly and methodically, trying to make it hurt as little as possible.  In other words, Powell is a pansy.  He will placate the market at the first signs of real stress, and we're much closer to that point than people realize.  It would not surprise me if he made a pivot to being data dependent once he gets the Fed funds rate up to 2.0%.  Being data dependent = watching the S&P 500.  If the SPX stabilizes or goes up, he could sneak in an extra 25 bps, if not, no rate hike.  Most likely scenario, after he gets to 2.0%, he will freeze if the stock market follows the post bubble pattern of Nikkei 1990, Shanghai 2007, Nasdaq 2000.  Freezing rate hikes at 2.0% with the economy heading south and inflation staying high = guarantee stagflation.  And my bet is that Powell will choose a guarantee slow burn stagflation to a fast burning painful deep recession with inflation back towards 2%.  

Just a weak weak market.  Another brutal selloff on Monday. It looks like it wants to test 3950 to see if there are buyers there before heading north.  May do a little dip buying if we see 3950-3970 levels Tuesday, for a short term trade.  I see a potential strong bounce this week after the CPI numbers come out and the 10/30 year auctions are behind us, but I don't expect a significant rally until you get to deeper value levels.  Ultimately I think we have to get down to the 3600-3700 level before tempting the value buyers and getting a real sustained counter trend move.  

I have little confidence in buying the dips in this market.  I have all the confidence in the world in shorting the rips.  This feels just like a repeat of 2000, with the same levels of heavy equity positioning.  That bear market lasted over 2 years.  We're only 4 months into this bear market.  We've got a long way to go. 

Bear Market Action

Yesterday was classic bear market action.  Even if this is a short term bottoming process, a messy U bottom that gives you multiple chances to buy the lows is a sign of weakness.  A clean V bottom, that only gives you one chance to buy the lows is a sign of strength.  We had V bottoms for most of 2009 to 2021.  U bottoms were rare.  Now the V bottoms are rare, and the U bottoms are back with a vengeance.

What was shocking about yesterday's selloff was the bond market weakness after a less hawkish Powell and a very weak stock market.  That is not a good sign for either stocks or bonds.  I though 3.00% 10 year yields would provide some resistance to this surge higher in yields, but it was just another speed bump towards higher yields.  Scary if you are leveraged long in bonds, like a lot of risk parity funds are, along with a long stock position.  A double whammy for risk parity, which are under extreme duress this year, and in particular since beginning of April.  

Powell's lack of inflation fighting credibility is hurting the bond market here, the market may have cheered his soft stance on rate hikes in knee jerk fashion, but after thinking about it for several hours, bond investors dumped en masse, even with a vicious stock selloff, realizing that inflation is the enemy, not higher short term rates.  

The only strong market that I see on my screen are commodities, which continue to truck higher.  Natural gas going to the moon, crude oil steadily rising and recovering from a sharp pullback in March/April, and diesel prices hitting all time highs, higher than 2008 levels when oil went to $147/barrel, speaking to a shortage of refinery capacity and strong demand for oil products.  Supply/demand dynamics are extremely bullish for most commodities.  Plus the obscene levels of excess liquidity provided by the Fed/Congress/White House in 2020-2021, which is just fuel for the fire.  

This is nothing like what we've seen for the last 13 years.  Many are offsides here:  risk parity funds, investors concentrated in tech, bond funds, passive equity funds, etc.  Really the only group that is relatively outperforming this year are the habitual underperformers, the hedge funds.  This may one of those periods where hedge funds propensity to be high fee, lower beta versions of SPY will help them, not hurt them.  

Dark pool activity/dealer gamma shows levels that usually lead to short term rallies, of course with the disclaimer that the data only goes back to 2011, so basically only covering a bull market.  Lots of statistical based strategies, mostly based on mean reversion buy the dip will fail in this bear market. 

Still waiting patiently for that ripe shorting opportunity in tech stocks, have a feeling its coming later this month. 

A Post Bubble Face Ripper

Pumping Powell pulled off an AAPL special:  under promise, over deliver.  This time, he raised expectations for rate hikes so high, that even just promising to do 50 bps at a time in the next 2 meetings was received as dovish.  In reality, he's sticking to his original plan back when he was talking hawkish in early April.  Its just the Eurodollars/Fed funds rate market that drank the Jim Bullard kool-aid and started pricing in a chance of a 75 bps move, when it wasn't going to happen.  

The market is acting according to script, scaring out investors and getting them nervous ahead of a big FOMC meeting, and then breathing a sigh of relief when Powell didn't talk more hawkish than he did a few weeks ago, resulting in a face ripper.  Big picture, the situation hasn't changed.  Fed is still on automatic pilot for the next couple of meetings, for rate hikes, so you can book 50 bps hike in June and probably 50 bps in July.  If the market starts to fall apart going into the July meeting, Powell could just do 25 bps in July to try to foment another short squeeze and rescue the market.  

In either case, the Fed funds rate will get up to 175-200 bps by end of July.  That would probably be enough for Powell to slow down and only do 25 bps hikes if the stock market is not weak.  That's way different than what the Eurodollars market is pricing in, which is penciling in 50 bps in June, 50 bps in July, 40 bps in Sept, 28 bps in Nov, and 23 bps in Dec.  That's a total of 191 bps of additional rate hikes in 2022.  That's not going to happen.  The market will break so hard if the Fed tried to follow the market pricing that Powell will pivot before he could pull it off, guaranteed. 

People don't learn from history.  How soon do we forget about Mr. Transitory.  Powell has no backbone, and he loves to find excuses to be dovish, or less hawkish.  How soon we forget about the dovish pivot in January 2019, after the S&P 500 went down 20%, and he kept the dovish pivot even as SPX was ripping to new all time highs in 2019.  

This time, It took 8% CPI to get him to finally stop QE and start talking about 25 bp hikes.  Only market pricing in 50 bps hikes for several meetings did he finally get the message and the balls to at least try to catch up to the Eurodollars market.  The Fed has never been a leader in starting the hawkish wave.  It waits for the market to price in rate hikes and then follows suit, usually being way too late.  

I know people love to rip on Jim Bullard, especially because his hawkish tone has sparked some selloffs in the past few months, but he's been right more than Powell.  Powell is a politician wearing a central banker costume.  He does what the politicians and the financial markets want him to do, in that order.  He could care less about price stability.  He's looking for positional stability, as in staying as Fed chairman for as long as possible. Once again, he will be praised for pumping the markets higher at the FOMC meeting.  If it was the opposite reaction, he would have been loudly jeered and criticized.  That's the nature of the central bank game.  It incentivizes the Fed chairman to be dovish.  Don't forget that. 

2022 reminds me of 2000, but worse.  Inflation is much higher and the budget deficits required to keep this pig afloat is now the highest that its ever been.  Once you start handing out money to solve short term economic problems, it becomes an addiction.  The Rona stimulus checks were enormously popular.  If you do a search on youtube, you'll see so many videos regarding stimulus checks and when they will arrive, whether there will be more, etc.  Also, with an aging demographic, Social Security and Medicare spending will keep going much higher, and those are golden gooses that politicians can't touch.  All that money that the elderly receive either through Social Security or through healthcare subsidies from Medicare are inflationary.  Money for doing nothing.  Money for being old and retired. 

Even in an inflationary environment, the government knows only one way to solve the problem, either hand out money or reduce taxes.  Already student debt is being forgiven, $10,000, and that's just the beginning.  Gas taxes will probably be eliminated or drastically reduced if oil prices keep going higher, which is very likely given the supply/demand situation.  The Republican party has basically become the Trump party, so like Trump, they will try to pump up the economy with short term band aid solutions like tax cuts and more stimmy.  Since Republicans are much more aggressive about tax cuts than Democrats, yet only slightly less aggressive on government spending, they would likely cause bigger budget deficits than big spending Democrats, and thus more stimulative for the economy.  Of course, since Republicans are much more politicially savvy than Democrats, they won't provide any of that stimmy under a Democrat president, and instead wait for Trump to retake the throne in 2024 to pour on the stimulus and tax cuts.  

Don't lose sight of the big picture.  The SPX and in particular, the NDX has topped out.  The price action is terrible.  I know a lot of people talk about the bearish AAII and II sentiment surveys, but those are only good contrarian signals in a bull market.  In a bear market, not so much.  Sure lots of people talk a bearish game, but are they still heavily invested in stocks?  Yes.  

I am sure most will agree that 2020 and 2021 was a giant speculative bubble (tons of SPAC IPOs, rampant speculation in meme stocks, ridiculous moves in tech stocks, bitcoin, etc.).  So in a post bubble environment that we've entered, the closest analog is Nasdaq 2000, especially considering how much retail investors got excited about stocks.  Nikkei in the late 1980s, 1990, Shanghai in the mid 2000s, 2007, are also good analogs of a bubble market.  

TINA has been engrained in the brains of millennials throughout the last 13 years.  Almost like tech stock speculation was engrained in the brains of baby boomers in the late 90s to 2000.  The usual aftermath of these speculative boom periods is an extended bear market.  Here are a few examples:

Nikkei 1990

Shanghai Composite 2007, Nasdaq 2000

Nasdaq 2021-2022

Past bubbles tell you that the first year of the post bubble downtrend is the steepest and most painful.  Right now, we are closing in on almost 6 months after the Nasdaq peak in November 2021.  So if past is prologue, you have at least another 6 months of a steep downtrend where countertrend rallies will be brief and be great shorting opportunities.  The Nasdaq will be the place to put on short bets, as its much weaker than SPX this year, and has much more froth and the worst overvaluations. 

The Worm has Turned

 2022 is turning out to be like 2000.  The second half of 2000 that is.  Here are the charts for 2000 and the past 12 months.

SPX daily (2000)

SPX daily (May 2021 to May 2022)

The worm has turned.  The bears are back.  They've been getting destroyed year after year since 2008.  Only brief glimmers of success taken back with a vengeance with each V bottom ripping the heart out of the shorts and annoying those holding mostly cash.  Its a different story now.  

This game is about making adjustments.  Like a 7 game series in the playoffs. After seeing what happens in game 1, you have to determine if you just had bad luck or if you actually had a bad strategy and the circumstances have changed.  There is a fine line between sticking with your strategy that has been working over the years but recently hasn't, and changing your strategy on the belief that the market regime has changed.  If it hasn't, you pay the price by missing out on a big move, or even worse, being faked out and being on the wrong side of one.  

The evidence is mounting that the market regime has changed.  Here are pieces of evidence:

1. Huge rally off the March 2020 bottom taking the SPX from 2192 to 4818 in less than 24 months.  

2. Highest ever price to book, price to revenue ratio for the S&P 500 in 2021.  

3. Massive equity inflows and retail participation in speculative garbage/meme stocks from November 2020 until January 2022, most since 2000.  Lots of weak hands and public is highly exposed to stocks. 

4. High inflation worrying politicians which leads to a hawkish Fed pivot.  Results in a weak bond market, 10 year yields up to 3.00%, and Fed funds rate still at 25-50 bps, and Powell seems hell bent on getting Fed funds at least up to 1.75-2.00% before he slows down.  

5. Lots of bearish sentiment in the sentiment surveys, but survey on equity allocation still very high (equity fund inflows have only recently turned into outflows).  Fully invested bears?

6. Nasdaq tech stock underperformance, financials very weak even with rates projected to go much higher.  

7. SPX is no longer giving bulls much time to sell the highs, rallies are sold quickly and the bottoms are messy, lots of U bottoms that lead to only brief rallies vs. V bottoms that lead to relentless rallies from 2009 to 2021. 

There are probably more things out there like specific fundamentals for big cap tech which showing slowing earnings momentum despite big time overvaluation, bearish leading indicators, etc.  

Yesterday, I could finally see some fear in the market as we broke the 4100 support level and made new lows for the year.  Its not a great way to make a bottom, but a lot of pre-FOMC hedging / risk reduction happened over the past several days and it looks similar to the pre March FOMC setup that resulted in a big rally from 4140 to 4620 in 3 weeks.  Not expecting anything close to that since we're beyond the point of recognition and its the sellers, not the buyers who are more eager these days.  And seasonally, not a good time for investors from May to October.  

Very few investors are used to these type of markets, it hasn't happened in over 13 years.  The natural instinct of many fund managers is to wait for a big rally to sell, because they ALWAYS happen, right?  I tend to agree, but I don't think we'll be getting anything that lasts more than a month from these levels, so I would not be surprised if we go up to 4400-4500 area and then go right back down to 4100.  Its a seller's market.  Something that investors are not used to.  Investors talk bearish, but are they still fully invested?  It seems retail investors are, while hedge funds have rightfully turned cautious this year, and for once in a blue moon, are actually outperforming the SPX.  

Still low equity exposure, with most of it in energy.  Staying away from taking significant SPX positions, unless its on a short setup.  Going long SPX is treacherous in this market and to be avoided except for catching brief rallies after big dips.